NEWS

/NEWS
512, 2016

Labour Party Submission to MRconsult. Good Objectives but Muddled Thinking

December 5th, 2016|

During the week commencing 7th November, the Labour Party submitted its proposals  to the Government Consultation titled : Reporting and acting on child abuse and neglect. In the 2015 Labour manifesto it said :

lab-manifesto-mr-3

Here is our review of it. Our observations are indented in italics between the body of Labour’s submission. (more…)

411, 2016

Govt Secures NSPCC Support for Child Protection Proposal Designed to Fail

November 4th, 2016|

Mandate Now review of NSPCC Submission to the consultation on reporting and acting on child abuse and neglect which closed on 13 Oct 2016 :

Mandate Now review comments are italicised.

Conclusion 

The submission appears to have much more to do with the relationship the NSPCC has with Government than it does with the effective protection of children by Regulated Activities. Its support for the Government’s preferred option of ‘Duty to Act,’ which relabels the status quo with the prime objective of keeping any increase in referrals to a minimum, indicates the charity’s strapline ‘every childhood is worth fighting for’ is in doubt.  

(more…)

210, 2016

MN Response to Option 3 of MR Consult: Duty to Act in relation to child abuse and neglect

October 2nd, 2016|

Option 3 Conclusion : Mandate Now rejects the proposal.

The proposal requires no one to report anything because there is no legal mandate to report. No one is protected if they do report a concern because the report remains discretionary since the required action under the duty is unspecified.  If they don’t act in a way they should have acted,  and with the benefit of hindsight and possibly years later,  the failure to act ‘could’ be criminalised.   (more…)

2609, 2016

Review of Option 2 of MR Consult: Introduce a Mandatory Reporting Duty in Relation to Child Abuse

September 26th, 2016|

Conclusion : Mandate Now rejects the Government’s option 2 proposal in the consultation which was issued on 21/7/16

  • Through the definition of the term “practitioner” LA children’s services will both be mandated reporters and the recipients of their own reports.
  • The proposal allows no flexibility in LA arrangements for triaging and handling reports for instance using the LADO or a Multi-Agency Safeguarding Hub.
  • Less serious cases of non-reporting will be addressed by disciplinary rather than criminal sanctions. Such sanctions have failed to influence child protection. Sanctions depend on organisations acting potentially against their own interests to apply disciplinary sanctions. There is no proposed sanction on an organisation for failing to take disciplinary action, therefore this is not “mandatory” reporting but a minor variation to the discretionary reporting arrangements currently in
  • The consultation proposal provides little or nothing in the way of legal protections for those who report.
  • The proposal covers only a limited number of Regulated Activities

 

There are three curious things about the consultation proposal for mandatory reporting. (more…)

806, 2016

A Review of: MR law on reporting and identification of CSA: A seven year time trend analysis

June 8th, 2016|

Mandate Now review of :

Published April 2016

Published April 2016

Click on image to enhance quality

The Mandate Now position has always been that we follow the evidence. If sound research were to show that mandatory reporting in Regulated Activities (e.g. schools, hospitals etc.) were unhelpful to detecting child sex abuse, then we would stop our campaign for the introduction of such a law.

The government has consistently opposed mandatory reporting, and has cited various academic research papers which it claims support its position. These include: (more…)

1305, 2016

New Research: Impact of Mandatory Reporting Law : A Seven year Longitudinal Analysis

May 13th, 2016|

The long delayed consultation on Mandatory Reporting (“MR”), ceded from Government on 28th October 2014 in the House of Lords during the passage of the Serious Crimes Bill, still awaits launch.  But this has borne an advantage with the release earlier this week of important new longitudinal research into the effects of MR from Ben Mathews, LLB, BA, PhD, Associate Professor in the School of Law at Queensland University of Technology in Brisbane, Australia. He is also Director of Research in the School of Law and is co-Leader of the Children’s Rights and Welfare research program in QUT’s Children and Youth Research Centre.

Dr Mathews’ major area of research expertise is in children and the law, with a focus on issues concerning law and child maltreatment, civil damages for child abuse, children and educational systems, medico-legal issues, children’s rights, cultural violence against children, and children’s criminal responsibility. He has conducted large multidisciplinary studies of laws regarding the reporting of child maltreatment and has published extensively in Australia and internationally, with 45 publications. Ben’s research and knowledge translation has led to changes in law, policy and practice. (more…)