Press Release
“Schools are no safer now than they were 50 years ago”, say Caldicott abuse survivors.
“Schools are no safer now than they were 50 years ago”, say Caldicott abuse survivors.
Two days before the sentencing hearing of Peter Wright, the former headmaster of Caldicott School, Tom was interviewed by Jon Snow who asked about the dynamics of abuse and the progress on Mandatory Reporting. During the time Tom was in the Channel4 studio Hugh Henry who had abused pupils at Gayhurst school in Gerrards Cross as well as Caldicott and who featured on the same indictment as Wright, committed suicide by stepping onto the railway tracks at Amersham.
The Wright case finally permitted reporting restrictions to be lifted and the scale of abuse at Caldicott started to see daylight. There were other teachers against whom complaints were made, many were by then dead. This included Peter Hill the former Deputy Head to Wright, who committed suicide some years before Wright was first charged.
Here is a chronology of court appearances, indictments, and outcomes:
Whenever an inquiry starts one can expect only to bring a proportion of perpetrators to court. And so it was with Caldicott. Following the broadcast of ‘Chosen,’ a number of former pupils complained of sexual abuse by former Deputy Head George Hill who committed suicide some time before Wright was first charged in 2003. It is speculated sight loss contributed to his decision.
Restriction applied for large periods of time. Men silenced for decades where silenced once again. Reporting restrictions on the the cases of Addrison and Geddes and Henry applied until Wright’s conviction. Finally the Caldicott cases were reported:
Here is the interview with Jon Snow.
Tom on C4 News QT from True Vision on Vimeo.
The Caldicott case which was reported extensively by Andrew Norfolk of the Times, seemed to be the catalyst for what followed. Just a few weeks later this article appeared, and many more followed.
You can read more articles about the trials and see the documentary that assisted get the cases to court here
Under increasing pressure from our sustained campaign for the introduction of Mandatory Reporting the NSPCC felt the need to clarify its firmly held position against mandatory reporting which you can see here.
CEOP Thematic Assessment The Foundations of Abuse | Paragraph 87 : It may be necessary to ensure those working in any capacity in institutional settings come forward around safeguarding issues via some form of mandatory reporting.
The Home Affairs Committee report: Child Sexual Exploitation and Grooming Report suggested Mandatory Reporting be considered – Paragraph 130:
‘We recommend that the Government commission work to examine the feasibility of introducing a statutory duty to co-operate and share information to tackle child sexual exploitation. We also recommend that the Government examine the Florida Protection of Vulnerable Persons Act passed in 2012 in order to ascertain whether the mandatory reporting of child abuse could, and should, be implemented in England and Wales.’
You can read the full report here.
Her Majesty’s Inspector of Constabulary – in its report ‘Mistakes Were Made’ suggested Mandatory Reporting should be considered in recommendation 3: ‘We consider that a system of mandatory reporting should be examined whereby those who, in the course of their professional duties, become aware of information or evidence that a child is or has been the victim of abuse should be under a legal obligation to notify their concerns to others.’