610, 2016

Mandate Now Submission to Consultation: Reporting and Acting on Child Abuse and Neglect

October 6th, 2016|

The Mandate Now submission is here

Within our submission we have reviewed the two Government proposals. Neither provide a framework on which reliable child protection can be delivered by those employed in Regulated Activities. Government is promoting positions close to the status quo that prompted the Home Secretary, now Prime Minister, to initiate the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse. Lessons are not being learned.  

The consultation closed at noon on 13th October 2016.

Updated 17.3.17

2104, 2017

#MR Bill Underway for USA Athletes following Senate Hearing and Grey-Thompson Now Wants It

April 21st, 2017|

Baroness Tanni Grey-Thompson’s – ‘Duty of Care in Sport’ report is published today.

A key paragraph is on p.20 under  in ‘Theme 5’- safeguarding.

Mandatory reporting

It should be recognised that organisations that work with children and vulnerable adults can attract individuals who will seek to exploit and abuse them – there is a need for continual vigilance. The government should therefore consider extending a Duty to Report to all sports organisations. This would mean that if a person knows, or has suspicion of, any abuse taking place, they must report it to the relevant body for action to be taken.

You can download it here.

The report makes clear why mandatory reporting is needed to improve the safeguarding culture in sport. The following paragraph describes the current challenges that suggest sport may not be capable of self motivated reform.


Contributors to the review reported that it was often difficult to challenge the programmes that they were in, and hard to know where to go if they want to make a complaint about behaviour. It was also clear that people did not want to be seen to be causing trouble or jeopardise their sporting career, and felt they had little power to bring about change. Many reported that bullying behaviour could at least sometimes be the ‘norm’ in sport, and that they felt that they just had to “get on with it”. This suggests that in some areas the culture is not the positive one that it should be. It is vital that participants know where they can go to make a complaint or blow the whistle on poor behaviour. Without second and, critically, third party assurance, the ability to make substantial change is limited.

Let’s hope the government takes notice, but such is the prejudice against mandatory reporting  by Government, police, LSCB’s Social Workers, teaching unions and the increasingly out of touch NSPCC,  all supporting the Government’s addiction to the failed status quo, that one fears Baroness Grey-Thompson may be howling into the wind.

Meanwhile in the USA :

Star gymnasts testify to Senate judiciary committee about sex abuse scandal

  • Unites States Olympic Committee (‘USOC’) apologizes for ‘failing the people it was supposed to protect’
  • Senator Chuck Grassley criticizes USA Gymnastics for declining to testify
  • Dominique Moceanu describes a ‘culture of fear’ and ‘humiliation’

A current mandatory reporting Bill proposed and sponsored by members of the US Senate judiciary committee will require sports governing bodies under the USOC umbrella to report allegations of sexual abuse to law enforcement and train employees on how to handle situations. The statute of limitations for victims to sue their abusers would also be extended.

Each of the gymnasts giving testimony confirmed the introduction of Mandatory Reporting of known and suspected abuse would positively impact the protection of children in sport.

The conditions for elite sportspeople are almost identical in the UK, with the role of staff and coaches being vitally important.  If mandatory reporting is now seen as an essential component of functioning child protection in sport within the USA, how can it not be in the UK?  We would welcome the British Government drawing the same conclusions from the same evidence and introduce mandatory reporting in the UK.

Well designed designed Mandatory Reporting in sport is essential. We said so in our submission to the consultation – Reporting and Acting on Child Abuse and Neglect which we helped secure. We also included draft legislation which specified sport as a Regulated Activity to be included. We await the outcome from the Home Office.   

2403, 2017

Mandatory reporting laws for child sexual abuse are essential for kids and society: Professor Ben Mathews

March 24th, 2017|

Professor Ben Mathews is a researcher in the Australian Centre for Health Law Research at Queensland University of Technology in Brisbane, Australia. He has led some of the largest studies ever undertaken into mandatory reporting laws for child sexual abuse.

In the UK, 18% of girls and 5% of boys experience contact sexual abuse (one in eight children), and the figures are even higher for all kinds of sexual abuse. The mean age of onset is 9-10. Most children unlucky enough to suffer sexual abuse are unable to tell anyone, because they are terrified of the abuser’s power, have been threatened, feel ashamed, depend on the abuser, or are too young to understand it. (more…)

603, 2017

Child Protection in Football – An Article in The Independent Reliant on Hearsay and Hope

March 6th, 2017|

On Wednesday 1st March Ian Herbert, Chief Sports Writer for the Independent, under the banner Football is not rife with child abusers, so it is time for the Offside Trust to explain what they are for,’  writes a eulogy to the FA’s current child protection framework. Is it right to do so? We examine his claims and the foundations on which they are grounded.

The piece informs us: (more…)

102, 2017

West Berks SCB – The Unconvincing Serious Case Review into Child Sexual Abuse at Kennet School

February 1st, 2017|

The report was released by West Berkshire Safeguarding Children’s Board at noon today. 

A copy of the review is here: Kennet School Serious Case Review

This is the Mandate Now review of this opaque production.

The SCR doesn’t actually describe what failings have occurred and whether as a result the abuse could have been prevented or could have been halted earlier than it was. (more…)

2601, 2017

Alternative Perspective on NSPCC – closing ‘Loopholes in Sport’ VictoriaLIVE 26.1.17

January 26th, 2017|

  • The NSPCC suggestions for changes to the DBS system will only protect children from abusers who are already known.
  • The shortcomings arising from the DBS being relaxed in 2012, which can permit ‘barred’ people to work with children periodically if they are supervised, was debated in the House of Lords during the passage of the Protection of Freedoms Act  in November 2011 by two peers with distinguished sporting backgrounds. Why only now has the NSPCC alighted on this issue?  Should it not have been raising this point and objecting to the legislation when it was going through Parliament?
  • The NSPCC proposal to extend duty of care to 16 and 17 year olds, which already exists in education,  is a sound principle. It will though have a limited effect in practice because data [Characteristics Children in Need 2014-15 Table A3 – ] indicates the proportion of children suffering abuse or neglect (both sexes) in this age group is 14% while in the younger group, which is already included within the scheme in ‘statutory guidance’  it is 86%.  (Statutory guidance is discretionary)


1912, 2016

Key Speeches from HoL Debate 15.12.16 : Allegations of child sexual abuse within football clubs

December 19th, 2016|

On the same day as the debate in the House of Lords, Mandate Now issued a press release under the headline ‘Confused Football Association safeguarding policy fails children‘ in which we reviewed the current child protection policy operating at the grassroots of football. Disturbingly the policy was endorsed by the Child Protection Sport Unit of the NSPCC despite it mistakenly claiming law exists to report abuse. A summary of the errors in the policy are available here.

Well meaning employees working in Regulated Activities who have responsibility for children in their care are being failed by a dysfunctional child protection framework, the legal foundation of which has always lacked law to report. It is still discretionary for an employee of a Regulated Activity to report suspected or known child abuse. In the event someone decides to report, they have the dilute Public Interest Disclosure Act to provide nominal protection. (more…)